anywho, I'll post more on the problems I have with award shows in general tomorrow, but some quick thoughts on the SAG awards
- TV nomination sucked. especially for actor/actresses Dude seriously did anyone actually watch any TV last year? I swear the only reason The closer and suits got a nom was because they were on cable, and theres this assumption that stuff on cable is always good, news flash, not true, I comment much on the winner, because I rarely watch american horror story, but no breaking bad, no Homeland and although I'm biased, no Fringe? and then Harry's Law got a nomination? now that just adds insult to injury, well I guess the tourist scored a golden globe nom last year, so the SAG is entitled to a similar stuff-up
- movie winners were not at all what I, or probably anyone else was expecting, the guy from the artist beating out Clooney for best lead actor, not to mention the help upset, I mean good for them, and they were all very good films, but I am surprised, the SAG usually is pretty conventional, probably trying to rise in precedence to be taken seriously as an award ceremony
- The Help surged to victory, mainly because it wasn't excepted to pick up really anything, I suspect the african american factor, but good for them, this and more importantly the press now actually puts them in Oscar contention
- conversely comedy TV and miniseries awards were as stock as it comes, did the same group of people really vote for both?
what really struck me is how important the BAFTA's are going to become in the Oscar race, with a much more spilt pack compared to most years, should be interesting by any matter
No comments:
Post a Comment